Most retention advice treats manufacturing workers as a single group. They’re not. A press operator, a CNC machinist, and a process engineer stay for very different reasons, and they leave for different reasons too. If your retention strategy doesn’t account for those differences, you’re solving the wrong problem.
With Deloitte projecting that the manufacturing sector will need 3.8 million workers between 2024 and 2033 (and roughly half those roles may go unfilled), keeping the people you already have isn’t optional. Below, we break down employee retention strategies in manufacturing by the worker types that actually make up your floor, your shop, and your engineering department.
Manufacturing turnover remains a persistent challenge. A 2024 study by Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute found that 65% of manufacturers cite attracting and retaining talent as their primary business challenge. The cost of replacing a single worker is significant: Gallup estimates replacement costs range from one-half to two times an employee’s annual salary, with entry-level roles on the lower end and highly specialized or senior positions at the upper end.
But the dollar figure only tells part of the story. When experienced workers leave, they take tribal knowledge with them: the unwritten procedures, the machine quirks only they understand, the relationships with teammates that keep a line running smoothly. The remaining crew absorbs overtime, quality can slip, morale drops, and more departures follow.
For a deeper look at current industry data, see our manufacturing workforce trends report.
The core issue is that most manufacturers apply the same retention playbook to everyone on the payroll. A one-size-fits-all approach misses the mark because an hourly assembler and a controls engineer are motivated by fundamentally different things.
The strongest predictor of early-tenure turnover is poor job fit. When a new hire’s expectations don’t match reality, the clock starts ticking toward their departure almost immediately.
This is where retention and recruiting intersect:
Working with a staffing partner that specializes in manufacturing can reduce mis-hires because specialized recruiters screen for the job-specific and cultural factors that determine whether a placement sticks.
Hourly workers are often the highest-turnover group in manufacturing, and the reasons are usually straightforward.
What keeps them: Schedule predictability, fair treatment by supervisors, competitive base pay, and physical safety.
Specific tactics that work:
Don’t overlook multi-shift dynamics. Night and rotating shift workers face distinct morale challenges, from feeling invisible to leadership to missing company events that only happen during day shifts. Small gestures like shift-specific recognition or leadership rounding on off-hours go a long way.
Electricians, machinists, welders, and maintenance technicians are among the hardest manufacturing roles to fill. Losing one means losing years of accumulated expertise.
What keeps them: Mastery and craft pride, certification support, quality tools and equipment, and pay progression tied to skill advancement.
Specific tactics that work:
Skilled trades workers talk within their local community. Your reputation as an employer of choice (or as a place to avoid) travels fast. Retention and recruitment become a reinforcing cycle, good or bad.
Engineers and technical professionals have different priorities than floor workers, and they have more leverage in the job market.
What keeps them: Challenging projects, professional development, schedule flexibility, and involvement in decision-making.
Specific tactics that work:
Younger engineers (Gen Z and Millennials) also expect transparency about company direction, clear career trajectory, and a sense of purpose in their work. If your leadership team operates behind closed doors, technical talent will notice.
For more depth on this topic, read our guide to retaining top engineering talent.
While each worker segment has unique needs, some employee retention strategies in manufacturing apply universally:
Retention isn’t a program you launch and forget. You need metrics to know what’s working.
Track these numbers:
Benchmark your numbers against industry sources and review them quarterly. Stay interview data serves as a leading indicator: if employees are telling you about problems, you have a window to fix them before those problems show up in your turnover numbers.
Finally, connect the dots financially. Calculate what each open role costs in lost productivity, overtime for remaining staff, recruiting fees, and training time for the replacement. When you can show leadership the dollar cost of turnover versus the dollar cost of a retention initiative, budget conversations get much easier.
If you’re not sure where to start with that calculation, this tool can help:
The manufacturers who hold onto their best people aren’t the ones with the flashiest perks. They’re the ones who understand that a press operator, a journeyman electrician, and a design engineer each need something different to feel valued, challenged, and secure.
Start by segmenting your turnover data by role type. Identify which group is leaving fastest and why. Then apply the targeted employee retention strategies in manufacturing that match their actual motivations.
Retention also starts earlier than most companies realize. Every hiring decision is a retention decision. Getting the right person in the right role, with the right expectations set from day one, is the most effective retention strategy you’ll ever implement.
U.S. manufacturing workforce statistics compiled from BLS, NAM, and Deloitte, with employment and labor trend insights for 2025–2026.
We’ve scoured the web and compiled a list of all manufacturing conferences in 2026 to keep you informed and connected in the industry.
What is a 9/80 work schedule? Learn how it works with real engineering and manufacturing examples, plus key benefits and drawbacks.